Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLewis, Patrick J
dc.creatorLevy, Justin
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-15T15:10:06Z
dc.date.available2019-08-15T15:10:06Z
dc.date.created2018-08
dc.date.submittedAugust 2018
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11875/2694
dc.description.abstractDiffusible iodine-based contrast-enhanced computed tomography (diceCT) is a new tool in the study of anatomy. With diceCT, researchers can visualize in situ soft tissue, in three dimensional space. The relationship of these results to traditional gross dissection is unknown. Despite this, it has begun to be used for quantitative comparisons. This approach requires more research to determine the comparability of diceCT and gross dissection. To study the relationship of these two methods, the head of a common marmoset, Callithrix jacchus, was stained in 2.5% Lugol’s solution (I2KI) for 37 days. The head CT scanned for digital dissection prior to physical dissection. Amira 5.6 was used for digital segmentation to reconstruct connective, epithelial, muscle, and nervous tissues. Masses of muscle were taken for muscle density comparisons to the previously established mammalian muscle density constants. Based on Bland-Altman analyses, gross dissection and diceCT do not produce comparable measurements in all circumstances. Muscle and epithelial tissue, as well as volumetric measurements are significantly different between gross dissection and diceCT. Muscle densities were also found to be significantly different than previously established constants, through the use of one sample t tests. New, diceCT-calibrated constants are proposed for use with specimens that cannot be dissected. Muscle density is not constant, and should not be treated as such. This process is still widely beneficial when traditional destructive dissection is not possible. It allows for three dimensional views of structures that are not otherwise visible due to size and/or morphology, however, comparisons between gross dissection and diceCT should be approached with caution.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectDiffusible iodine-based contrast-enhanced computed tomography (diceCT)
dc.subjectGross dissection
dc.subjectThree-dimensional imaging
dc.subjectComparison
dc.subjectMuscle density
dc.subjectCallithrix jacchus
dc.subjectEpithelial tissue
dc.subjectMuscle tissue
dc.subjectVolumetric data
dc.titleAnalog vs digital: Testing the comparability and compatibility of diceCT and gross dissection, with special emphasis on muscle tissue
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.updated2019-08-15T15:10:06Z
thesis.degree.departmentBiological Sciences
thesis.degree.grantorSam Houston State University
thesis.degree.levelMasters
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science
dc.type.materialtext
dc.creator.orcid0000-0003-4646-8066


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record