Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPierce, Vaudau P
dc.creatorHughen, Barbara Jean,1943-
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-17T16:34:01Z
dc.date.available2022-05-17T16:34:01Z
dc.date.issued1967
dc.date.submitted1967, August.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11875/3387
dc.description.abstractIt was the purpose of this study to show the effect of language on philosophy and that the language of ethics can simultaneously have more than one of the four functions of evaluative, emotive, prescriptive, and descriptive language. The methods used to fulfill the purpose involved an analysis of the language of moral judgements used by William James in three of his most representative essays on ethics: " Is Life Worth Living?" " The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life", and "On a Certain Blindness in Human Beings." From the evidence presented in this study the following recommendations appear to be in order: 1. It should be recognized that the language of ethics can have more than one function simultaneously, which is a recognition at variance with some linguists of philosophy. 2. It should be recognized that the meaning of philosophical writings, in this case ethical contexts, can be made clearer through the analysis of the language used.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectJames, William
dc.subjectlanuage of ethics
dc.subjectmoral judgements
dc.titleAn analysis of the ethical language of William James
dc.typeThesis
thesis.degree.departmentEnglish
thesis.degree.grantorSam Houston State College
thesis.degree.levelMasters
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Art
dc.contributor.committeeMemberLeonard Zellar
dc.contributor.committeeMemberEarline Dolive.
dc.type.materialText


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record