Experiences of Graduate-level Faculty Regarding Interaction in Online Courses

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorCombs, Julie P.
dc.creatorMckenzie, Weena
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-13T16:18:55Z
dc.date.available2019-12-13T16:18:55Z
dc.date.created2019-12
dc.date.issued2019-11-05
dc.date.submittedDecember 2019
dc.date.updated2019-12-13T16:18:55Z
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this phenomenological study was to explore the experiences of instructors related to student interaction in online graduate courses. This in-depth investigation of the experiences and perceptions of online, graduate-level instructors revealed the nature of various types of interaction and some of the barriers to interaction in their courses. Utilizing Moustakas’s phenomenological design, criterion sampling and reputational sampling techniques were used to nominate 12 online, graduate-level instructors to participate. Of those 12 nominees, eight instructors were available and willing to participate in individual interviews. Three major themes emerged from the data. One of the perceived barriers to interaction in online, graduate-level courses was the lack of training of instructors for online teaching. Learning to teach online required taking personal initiative for these instructors. The role of instructors as facilitators of online courses was described as encompassing the intentional design of all aspects of the class and actively teaching the class and interacting with students. These instructors also described the time requirements of teaching online. They emphasized how much more time is required to teach online versus to teach face-to-face. Teaching online was also described as “invisible labor” when contrasted with teaching face-to-face. The rich description of current practices for facilitating interaction in online, graduate-level courses gained from this study provided insight to benefit both instructors and program administrators. Instructors should allow for the extra preparation and teaching time required by online courses. Program administrators should advocate for specialized instruction for online faculty, who need training focused on available online tools, how to create interaction in online environments, and appropriate online workloads. Program administrators should also advocate for an institutional office of online instruction that houses instructional designers to assist faculty. Program administrators must also acknowledge the “invisible labor” of online instruction and find ways to honor the additional time required to teach effective online courses. The online, graduate-level instructors in this study described competing demands for their time and a lack of training as barriers to interaction. Ultimately, these instructors invested their time and effort into designing effective courses, actively teaching those courses, and interacting with their students.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11875/2728
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectOnline
dc.subjectDistance learning
dc.subjectGraduate education
dc.subjectGraduate-level
dc.subjectInteraction
dc.subjectPhenomenology
dc.subjectQualitative research
dc.subjectMoore’s theory of transactional distance
dc.titleExperiences of Graduate-level Faculty Regarding Interaction in Online Courses
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.materialtext
thesis.degree.departmentEducational Leadership
thesis.degree.grantorSam Houston State University
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Education

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
MCKENZIE-DISSERTATION-2019.pdf
Size:
652.5 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
LICENSE.txt
Size:
1.85 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt
Size:
5.84 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

Electronic Theses and Dissertations